← All demos·Field Ops
Interactive demo AEC & Construction

Change Order Drafter

A change request becomes a properly-formatted change order — in your firm's template — in two minutes.

45 min → 4 mintime per change order

⚡ Change Order Analyzer

AI reviews incoming change order requests, assesses risk exposure, recommends a response strategy, and drafts the formal letter — in under 60 seconds.

CO: CO-047 CONTRACTOR: Skanska VALUE: $284,000 SCHEDULE IMPACT: 14 days claimed

Incoming Change Order Request — CO-047

CO-047
Skanska USA Civil West
April 28, 2026
$284,000
14 calendar days
Owner-Directed / DSC Claim

Unforeseen subsurface conditions encountered during excavation at Metro Station B foundation zone. Upon reaching design subgrade elevation at -22 ft. below grade, contractor encountered existing buried concrete cap (estimated 6" thickness, continuous along 180 LF of station footprint). Buried cap was not shown on contract drawings or geotechnical report and required removal and replacement with new 6" reinforced concrete cap per structural engineer's field direction. Contractor requests $284,000 additional compensation and 14-calendar-day schedule extension to critical path activity ST-04 (Structural Foundation).

Assessing risk, evaluating claim merit, and drafting formal response...
$84,000

Estimated claim exposure avoided through AI-guided negotiation

Negotiated target: $200,000 vs. $284,000 requested
PANEL 1 OF 3

AI Risk Assessment

RISK SEVERITY SCORE
0
LOW MEDIUM-HIGH CRITICAL
  • DSC claim has legal merit — buried cap not in geotech report
  • Cost markup (32%) appears inflated vs. industry norms (15–18%)
  • 14-day extension likely overstated; actual critical path impact: est. 5–7 days
  • No third-party cost estimate submitted with claim
PANEL 2 OF 3

Recommended Response

⚖️
AI Recommendation
NEGOTIATE
  • Accept the DSC basis — buried conditions are legitimate differing site conditions under the contract's DSC clause (GC-6.04)
  • Challenge the cost markup — request detailed cost breakdown; dispute 32% markup, counter with 15%
  • Reject 14-day extension — commission independent CPM schedule analysis; counter with 6 days based on concurrent activity review
  • Target settlement: $200,000 and 6-day schedule extension
  • Require substantiation — subcontractor invoices, equipment time sheets, labor records
PANEL 3 OF 3

Formal CO Response Letter

Full letter generated below — scroll down to view the AI-drafted formal response.

KEY POSITIONS:
✓ DSC basis accepted
✗ $84K cost reduction requested
✗ 8-day schedule reduction contested
✓ Substantiation required within 15 days

AI-Drafted Formal Change Order Response Letter

TYPEWRITER OUTPUT

Stop leaving money on the table with reactive CO responses.

Crestline's team uses Purely Works to evaluate every CO in minutes — not days. Your firm can too.

Book a 30-Min Call →

Want this built for your firm?

This is a hands-on taste, wired to placeholder data. In a 30-minute call we'll scope what your version looks like — plugged into your real systems, on your real workflow.